EssayFilter vs Smodin: 99.9% Bypass Rate Wins
We tested both tools against Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality.AI. EssayFilter achieved a 99.9% bypass rate. Smodin was inconsistent. Here's the full breakdown — bypass rate, pricing, features, and which one you should actually use.
Feature comparison
EssayFilter vs Smodin
Objective comparison on the criteria that determine real-world results
| Feature | EssayFilter | Smodin |
|---|---|---|
| Processing speed | Under 10 seconds | 30-120 seconds |
| Bulk processing | Available on paid plans | Rarely supported |
| API access | Available on Pro+ | Rarely available |
| Algorithm updates | Weekly — tracks all detectors | Infrequent |
| Detector coverage | 12+ major detectors | 2-4 detectors |
| Watermark on output | None | Often present |
| Mobile support | Full — any device | Limited |
| Pricing | From $6.99/mo | Often more expensive |
What to evaluate
Why EssayFilter Outperforms Smodin
These are the signal criteria that matter — not features that look impressive in a product tour.
99.9% Verified Bypass Rate
EssayFilter is tested weekly against live Turnitin and GPTZero systems. Our bypass rate is real — not a marketing claim.
Zero Data Retention
Your content is processed and immediately deleted. We never store, share, or use your text — unlike many competitors.
Results in Under 10 Seconds
No queues, no waiting. EssayFilter processes your content faster than any competitor on the market.
Free Plan — No Card Required
Start humanizing immediately with 500 words per run. No credit card, no sign-up, no commitment.
Questions & Answers
Straightforward answers — no hedging.